WSU to Study Iraq Toxins' Effect
Spokesman-Review
by Bert Caldwell
Research to examine how exposure might damage offspring of soldiers
Washington State University scientists will use a $1.7 million grant to study what multi-generation genetic damage might be done by toxins U.S. troops could encounter in Iraq.
The research using laboratory rats, not humans, will be the first for the military to examine the epigenetic effects of pesticides, herbicides and other compounds, said lead scientist Michael Skinner, director of the university's Center for Reproductive Biology.
Previous studies have looked at the health effects of other substances, notably the Agent Orange used to defoliate jungles in Vietnam, on the soldiers directly exposed, he said, not on their children or grandchildren.
"The science really had not caught up with the trans-generational stuff," said Skinner, one of several WSU pioneers in the field of epigenetic, or multi-generational, inheritance.
Besides herbicides and pesticides – which and in what combinations has not been determined – the study also will look at the effects of explosives residues, he said.
The four-year study will allow researchers to see how any changes in genetic chemistry that develop are passed along through two subsequent generations of rats, he said, noting that only the first two years of research have been funded.
Among the problems that might develop are kidney disease, or changes in the male and female reproductive organs, he said.
If any genetic markers are identified in rats, Skinner said, follow-up research could look at whether they might show up among members of the military as well.
That would be of particular interest to Dave Holmes, interim chief operating officer of the Institute for Systems Medicine, which was awarded the U.S. Department of Defense grant passed through to Skinner.
Holmes' son, Tim Hammond, did two tours in Iraq with the U.S. Marine Corps.
"They sprayed all kinds of stuff on them," Holmes said.
Although the grant money, the first awarded ISM, will fund work in Pullman, he said the organization's supporters hope any subsequent clinical studies will be done in Spokane.
"There's a lot of excitement about making it happen," he said.





"Fighting for Our Veterans-Supporting Our Troops"
Proudly Serving All Branches & All Eras Since 1999
Search Veterans' Voice Site Below
Defense develops traumatic brain injury databases
To get a better handle on traumatic brain injury, one of the invisible wounds of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Defense Department is developing databases to track cases to aid diagnosis and treatment.
Vice Adm. Adam Robinson, the Navy surgeon general, told the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel on April 13 that the service has generated a spreadsheet for the Marine Corps to record blast injuries. Marines who have suffered three concussions from blasts -- which on the surface might not seem to have caused brain damage -- are required to undergo neurological examination, Robbins told lawmakers at the hearing.
Cmdr. Joseph "Cappy" Surette, spokesman for the Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, said field surgeons use the spreadsheet to identify Marines who have sustained possible battlefield concussions to ensure appropriate evaluations and follow-up care. The spreadsheet also helps identify Marines who sustained a concussion, but did not seek medical care, he added.
In addition, the Marine Corps plans to develop a nonmedical database for field commanders to better identify which of their troops have been exposed to concussive events. The system will be integrated with Navy medical systems to advance the research and treatment of traumatic brain injury, he said.
Air Force Col. Michael Jaffee, director of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, said there has been a shift in how the Defense Department tracks brain injuries in combat, moving from self-reporting to an incident-based tracking system. The department plans to release a policy on the new approach in the coming months.
Jaffee said Defense aims to merge operational information with medical data in a single database to track and identify traumatic brain injuries. This would take information from a battlefield incident -- such as a mine-resistant ambush protected vehicle hitting a mine -- and correlating it with the personnel on board, along with their medical evaluations.
Such a database, Jaffee said, would help identify personnel who could have sustained a blast injury versus those who sustained injury by hitting their head on the wall of the vehicle.
Defense also uses data compiled by the National Football League to study the effect of impact on the brain, Jaffee said. Football players can experience G forces of 100 Gs from a hit to the head, more than 10 times the force an F-15 fighter pilot experiences coming out of a dive, he said.
Michael Leggieri, director of Defense's Blast Injury Research Program Coordinating Office at the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command at Fort Detrick, Md., is evaluating information from helmet sensors worn by 5,000 soldiers and 2,000 Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan from March 2008 to March 2009.
The Army recorded 600 blast events from internal helmet sensors and more than 500 from external sensors, downloading the data to a secure database for review.
Since combat helmets have padding that partially deflects the blasts, Leggieri said his team could not use raw data from the sensors to conduct the research. Instead, researchers first had to develop an algorithm to filter out the effect of the padding.
The blast injury research center is crunching data from all 7,000 sensors with the help of the algorithm, and Leggieri said he expects to report results to senior Army leaders within a month.