The Veterans Voice
"Fighting for Our Veterans-Supporting Our Troops"
Proudly Serving All Branches & All Eras Since 1999
Mondo Times
Search Our Site Below

Bookmark and Share
The Veterans Voice
"Fighting for Our Veterans-Supporting Our Troops"
Proudly Serving All Branches & All Eras Since 1999
Mondo Times
Search Our Site Below

Bookmark and Share
Entire web
Thomas W. Stoddert, US Army Retired, is right on every point and I applaud his courage to write a very exacting letter.  My tenure at Madigan Army Medical Center as the NCOIC of the Department of Medicine made me aware of mismanaged policies and management issues.  I worked with a wonderful staff of professionals and paraprofessionals who conducted themselves very appropriately and courteously, with politeness, knowledge, experience and timeliness.  However, all of our efforts were frequently clouded by the frustrations of personnel shortages, ancillary demands of personnel, frustrations secondary to multi-echelon mismanagement issues, and numerous other problems.

The Department of Medicine includes 13 separate sections, clinics, and sub-departments, each with specific medical missions comprised of doctors, PA's, nurses, medical technicians, and support personnel, including military and civilian staff.  Some clinics have direct access through central appointments while many others required a referral from the primary care provider.  All too often miscommunication between various services and ancillary personnel would complicate scheduling problems.  An appropriate example: Patient "A" might be scheduled to see doctor "Z" in a specific clinic, but Dr. Z had to cancel all appointments because he/she had to support another military mission somewhere else on post or deploy to another country.

Frequently, the appointment schedule confusion was not because of medical staffing, but due to Central Appointments or Tri-Care issues for providing less than appropriate information to the patient and the provider.  Regardless who was at fault, the senior enlisted member of each clinic, section or department always tried to resolve relevant matters at the lowest level before involving the members of the Patient Representative Office and Patient Affairs Office. 

As the NCOIC or the department, I coordinated with the Patient Representative Office and Patient Affairs Office and designed placard's which identified the OIC and NCOIC of each clinic, section and department with a current photograph and a customer service statement bent on resolving problems or complaints at the lowest level.  The commanding general at the time accepted the design and ordered that it be implemented throughout the hospital.  The implementation was done in 2000 and I hope it is still in place. I am confident that the NCO's and OIC's at each level are fully capable of resolving conflicts and complaints, providing they get support from the senior management of medical care at Madigan Army Medical Center.

On the other hand, I and many others have all too often witnessed many frustrated and dissatisfied patients and family members who lack the patience to allow the system to work as it is designed.  These patients complain every chance they get and they become very loud and ugly about it, making treats, breaching the chain of command, and writing letters and memos to anyone who will listen.  The members of the Patient Representative Office and Patient Affairs Office do everything possible to bring providers and patients to a equitable arrangement, resolve appointment conflicts and ultimately bend-over-backwards.  Still, the patient complains and will ultimately use the same tactic every time they feel the need, regardless of how well or how often they have been treated with the same professional level of care that all patients and family members are given.

I am not blind and I do not wear rose colored glasses.  I know there are problems with the management of care at Madigan Army Medical Center and other military medical facilities.  However, there is no single mission in the military service that is as resource intensive as the medical mission on a daily basis.  Then the medical facilities must comply with and satisfy military and civilian laws, protocols, standards, inspections, and funding agencies.  All of this while still supporting the military missions of deployments, training, education, reassignments, and command emphasis issues. 

So, yes, a problem exists, but it will take the collective initiative of the soldier's at each facility to make the improvements, with the support of the Army Medical Corp senior management and mass influence of money and personnel.

Sincerely,
Alan B. Candia
U.S. Army (Ret.)   

Reader's Response Below
Question:
I am rated 100% unemployability. My ratings are as follows.
30% for chlorache from Agent Orange exposure
30% for PTSD
40% for diabetes
It also says on my award letter, "No Future Exams."
My question is do you think they can re-examine me in the future and take away my benefits?
Thank You,
Bob Clark

Answer:
Bob, Thanks for writing in to the "Veteran's Voice."

The VA can require a future exam at any time  if they feel there may be an issue of fraud or if a   gross mistake was made. But generally in cases like yours where they say no future exams,
they mean just that.

The VA can, if they have sufficient reason, propose to lower a rating percentage only if they        believe you may have gotten better or something has happened and they have to review
certain awards. This can happen as an example as the result of a mandate from Congress. The   issue of PTSD, was getting a lot of nasty attention by the national press and the VA went back   and started looking at this issue when it was awarded to  non-combat veterans.

However, the general rules are basically after five years, service connection can not rescinded,   but the rating percentage can be lowered; after ten years there can be no reduction in the rating percentage or severance of a service connected condition unless there was fraud.

All this to say, if you got a fair rating and they have said no future exams, just run with it. The  VA does not like to hassle vets when they do not need to.

Now, the down side, FYI. The VA does  routinely check up to see if you are working and so does    the Social Security Administration. They both allow you some grace in making some extra income because they know staying home vegetating is harmful. However, 100% unemployability is just that and both agencies frown on a veteran receiving benefits because they can not work and then go out and work full time. So check carefully and see what they allow you. I was told recently that these rules may have changed not too long ago.

Assuming you are not working you may want to consider doing volunteer work in the community and/or working with veterans. Here is where the fun starts. The VA, through the education department,  will sometimes purchase items to make a veteran's life more meaningful. In my case they helped me purchase computer equipment so that I can write like I am now and aid other veterans. Now that there is a war on, there are many opportunities to use your talents and experiences for others, particularly other vets.

So good luck and welcome home.
Thom
Thank you for your courage to tell it like it is!   The General is a good person but what can one person do?   Do you know who the members of her so-called command group are?   The Deputy Commander for Administration is ineffective, disinterested, weak and lame.   The Deputy Commander for Clinical Services is pretty smart but he is a poor leader, has no clue what his subordinates are supposed to do and he is leaving in a few weeks.   The Deputy Commander for Nursing is also lame and she is about to retire.   The Hospital Sergeant Major is also about to retire!    In addition to the problems you described, there are many others.   For example, I wish someone would approach Mr. and Ms. Horrell  and ask them what they know about nepotism and the merit system!   Madigan is a wonderful institution and has many great people but the fat, ineffective and overstaffed upper management needs to replaced and realigned now!  

Husband of a very concerned member of the Madigan Team  
Thomas W. Stoddert, US Army Retired, is right on every point and I applaud his courage to write a very exacting letter.  My tenure at Madigan Army Medical Center as the NCOIC of the Department of Medicine made me aware of mismanaged policies and management issues.  I worked with a wonderful staff of professionals and paraprofessionals who conducted themselves very appropriately and courteously, with politeness, knowledge, experience and timeliness.  However, all of our efforts were frequently clouded by the frustrations of personnel shortages, ancillary demands of personnel, frustrations secondary to multi-echelon mismanagement issues, and numerous other problems.

The Department of Medicine includes 13 separate sections, clinics, and sub-departments, each with specific medical missions comprised of doctors, PA's, nurses, medical technicians, and support personnel, including military and civilian staff.  Some clinics have direct access through central appointments while many others required a referral from the primary care provider.  All too often miscommunication between various services and ancillary personnel would complicate scheduling problems.  An appropriate example: Patient "A" might be scheduled to see doctor "Z" in a specific clinic, but Dr. Z had to cancel all appointments because he/she had to support another military mission somewhere else on post or deploy to another country.

Frequently, the appointment schedule confusion was not because of medical staffing, but due to Central Appointments or Tri-Care issues for providing less than appropriate information to the patient and the provider.  Regardless who was at fault, the senior enlisted member of each clinic, section or department always tried to resolve relevant matters at the lowest level before involving the members of the Patient Representative Office and Patient Affairs Office. 

As the NCOIC or the department, I coordinated with the Patient Representative Office and Patient Affairs Office and designed placard's which identified the OIC and NCOIC of each clinic, section and department with a current photograph and a customer service statement bent on resolving problems or complaints at the lowest level.  The commanding general at the time accepted the design and ordered that it be implemented throughout the hospital.  The implementation was done in 2000 and I hope it is still in place. I am confident that the NCO's and OIC's at each level are fully capable of resolving conflicts and complaints, providing they get support from the senior management of medical care at Madigan Army Medical Center.

On the other hand, I and many others have all too often witnessed many frustrated and dissatisfied patients and family members who lack the patience to allow the system to work as it is designed.  These patients complain every chance they get and they become very loud and ugly about it, making treats, breaching the chain of command, and writing letters and memos to anyone who will listen.  The members of the Patient Representative Office and Patient Affairs Office do everything possible to bring providers and patients to a equitable arrangement, resolve appointment conflicts and ultimately bend-over-backwards.  Still, the patient complains and will ultimately use the same tactic every time they feel the need, regardless of how well or how often they have been treated with the same professional level of care that all patients and family members are given.

I am not blind and I do not wear rose colored glasses.  I know there are problems with the management of care at Madigan Army Medical Center and other military medical facilities.  However, there is no single mission in the military service that is as resource intensive as the medical mission on a daily basis.  Then the medical facilities must comply with and satisfy military and civilian laws, protocols, standards, inspections, and funding agencies.  All of this while still supporting the military missions of deployments, training, education, reassignments, and command emphasis issues. 

So, yes, a problem exists, but it will take the collective initiative of the soldier's at each facility to make the improvements, with the support of the Army Medical Corp senior management and mass influence of money and personnel.

Sincerely,
Alan B. Candia
U.S. Army (Ret.)   

Reader's Response Below
Thank you for your courage to tell it like it is!   The General is a good person but what can one person do?   Do you know who the members of her so-called command group are?   The Deputy Commander for Administration is ineffective, disinterested, weak and lame.   The Deputy Commander for Clinical Services is pretty smart but he is a poor leader, has no clue what his subordinates are supposed to do and he is leaving in a few weeks.   The Deputy Commander for Nursing is also lame and she is about to retire.   The Hospital Sergeant Major is also about to retire!    In addition to the problems you described, there are many others.   For example, I wish someone would approach Mr. and Ms. Horrell  and ask them what they know about nepotism and the merit system!   Madigan is a wonderful institution and has many great people but the fat, ineffective and overstaffed upper management needs to replaced and realigned now!  

Husband of a very concerned member of the Madigan Team  
Question:
I am rated 100% unemployability. My ratings are as follows.
30% for chlorache from Agent Orange exposure
30% for PTSD
40% for diabetes
It also says on my award letter, "No Future Exams."
My question is do you think they can re-examine me in the future and take away my benefits?
Thank You,
Bob Clark

Answer:
Bob, Thanks for writing in to the "Veteran's Voice."

The VA can require a future exam at any time  if they feel there may be an issue of fraud or if a   gross mistake was made. But generally in cases like yours where they say no future exams,
they mean just that.

The VA can, if they have sufficient reason, propose to lower a rating percentage only if they        believe you may have gotten better or something has happened and they have to review
certain awards. This can happen as an example as the result of a mandate from Congress. The   issue of PTSD, was getting a lot of nasty attention by the national press and the VA went back   and started looking at this issue when it was awarded to  non-combat veterans.

However, the general rules are basically after five years, service connection can not rescinded,   but the rating percentage can be lowered; after ten years there can be no reduction in the rating percentage or severance of a service connected condition unless there was fraud.

All this to say, if you got a fair rating and they have said no future exams, just run with it. The  VA does not like to hassle vets when they do not need to.

Now, the down side, FYI. The VA does  routinely check up to see if you are working and so does    the Social Security Administration. They both allow you some grace in making some extra income because they know staying home vegetating is harmful. However, 100% unemployability is just that and both agencies frown on a veteran receiving benefits because they can not work and then go out and work full time. So check carefully and see what they allow you. I was told recently that these rules may have changed not too long ago.

Assuming you are not working you may want to consider doing volunteer work in the community and/or working with veterans. Here is where the fun starts. The VA, through the education department,  will sometimes purchase items to make a veteran's life more meaningful. In my case they helped me purchase computer equipment so that I can write like I am now and aid other veterans. Now that there is a war on, there are many opportunities to use your talents and experiences for others, particularly other vets.

So good luck and welcome home.
Thom
Thom Stoddert
KAZMIERCZAK
VA 101: The Basics
Know & Understand VA Benefits
A.O. My Perspective
VA Rating Schedule
Understanding Basic VA Benefits
Evidence Is Everything With the VA
Don't Be Stupid,                 Get the Truth
Veterans For Peace....???
Stoddert Assignment Berlin
The ABC’s of Individual Unemployability
Understanding Evidence and the Rating Letter

 
By Thom StoddertJust two basic tools, or rules, are needed when working with the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) when making a claim for compensation - an understanding of what evidence is needed and an understanding of the Rating Decision letter. Appropriate evidence supporting a claim is as essential as it can get, and understanding what the Rating Letter has documented will empower the claimant.

  The VA has a new system to decide claims for benefits that is much faster than traditional methods, months instead of years. The process is called the “Fully Developed Claim.” Whereas under the traditional method, a vet would file a claim, wait for the VA to respond, send in what they wanted, wait for them to accumulate the evidence, and then wait for them to adjudicate the claim.  Now the vet can just send everything they will want by doing the work themselves. If done correctly, the claimed benefit is awarded in about three months; otherwise the claim is relegated to the traditional method of adjudication.

  Evidence makes a claim viable and allows the VA to grant benefits. All during training for work on the Rating Board, the instructors would say, “Grant all you can and deny only if you must.” In other words the evidence available provides the permission to grant benefits. The evidence must be appropriate and have compelling value. It must be logical to a reasonable person. So what is good evidence?

Evidence must show that the requirements for that benefit program have been met which links it to the veteran’s military service. Military service medical records are the most common form of evidence to begin with, and then there must be evidence that the condition is chronic. Since no two veterans are the same, there is no cookie cutter approach to developing evidence.
 
For Agent Orange related issues, there must be documentation showing that the veteran was in an area sprayed by a defoliant and the veteran has a disease that has been associated to herbicide exposure by research. There are about 15 such medical conditions, diabetes being the most common.

When there is a mental health issue, the VA will want to see evidence the condition began during active duty, because of military service, or was made worse by military service. Things like a Readjustment Disorders, PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury, and personality disorders are very closely related and only time will differentiate them. Most service officers will push the veteran to get treatment first and put getting compensation last. There is sound logic behind that, because treatment gives the vet more information to work with in developing a better quality of life and for developing evidence for a claim, without the aggravation and stress of battling with the VA.
 
You have to wonder about veterans who focus on compensation more than they do treatment and so will the VA. So again, medical treatment will build good credible evidence. Plan your evidence you want to submit, while getting help for yourself and the claim.

  In the case of some diseases, they are diagnosed several years after the veteran left active duty. The VA recognizes that medical conditions may have slowly worsened over years before the vet became sick and most likely began while the vet was on active duty. Cancers, and muscular dystrophy are a  couple that can be given the status of service connection even as long as seven years after leaving the military.

  There are many instances of a service member being hurt and thinking themself to be immortal continues on. A year or so after the military that injury is getting worse and can’t be ignored any more. The vet is pragmatic with himself or herself and asks is there real evidence to show that injury was incurred in the service and not afterwards - probably not. However, the statements from former NCOs, officers, and/or friends can be as good as medical records. The statements are called “buddy letters” or “lay statements.” These letters should be short, to the point – no war stories, just the specifics. The VA will evaluate the probative value of the letter.

  It has been said so many times, “the VA denies till you die.” However, had the veteran read and understood the Rating Decision letter, he or she would have most likely over come the denial. The letter is, by law, required to tell the veteran how to overcome the denial. The Rating Letter also contains some other very useful information for the veteran.

  The Rating Letter is the document that VA sends you with big black seal of the VA on the front page, and describes briefly your military history. Then it lists the evidence used to make the decision(s). Finally, it discusses each issue separately, what and why the decision was given to that issue, how a higher rating could be awarded, and if the issue was denied – how the denial could be overcome.

The VA, by law, must explain why they gave or refused benefits and what evidence was evaluated or was not available. That is where to begin. Is there evidence you know of that the VA did not use? Did they misunderstand the evidence they had? Assume that many VA employees would not know the difference between a tank and an Aircraft Carrier and they are under pressure to produce.

Another point few vets understand is that any decision made by the VA is not final for one year. This means if you send in better evidence within one year, you may get a better decision or the denial of benefits reversed. Key word here is “better” evidence, not more.

  It is the veteran’s choice to use the Fully Developed Claims process or the traditional method. In either case the vet should work closely with a knowledgeable service officer from an established service organization such as the American Legion or Veterans of Foreign Wars, or if capable and up for the challenge, do it themselves. Never pay for help, directly or indirectly.
Thom Stoddert, former VA Rating Specialist
Bio Here
How the VA Does Not Work
Saudi Syndrome from a VA
Finding Supporting Evidence
Healing, Reunions and Branson, MO
The Rating Schedule and Special Monthly Compensation
Ordinary Info that Every One Screws Up!
Scams & VA Benefits       Part 1
Scams & VA Benefits       Part 2
Scams & VA Benefits       Part 3
VA Ratings Basics
VA Ratings for Hearing
VA Benefits Basics 10
Veteran’s Overcoming Common VA Errors
VA Math
s, DIC and Pension
gger than Most Realize
PTSD Coach
Hearing Loss compensation
Aid and Attendance, Pension, Without Strings Attached
I Hope This Upsets You!
Special Cases of Unemployability
Corruption At Madigan
An Informative War Memorial Torpedoed By Pettiness & Politics
Nigerian Banker's Corruption Surpassed by Army Hospitals
It’s All About the Evidence
Scams, Shams, and Deceit
Scams, Shams, and Deceit
Care With Compassion?
A “Combat” Clerk Typist More
Roger Flygare Should Apologize More
Care With Compassion?
Madigan Corrunption
VA Unemployability
Little Known Tidbitsfrom VA
Little Known Tidbitsfrom VA